Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The domestic garden – Its contribution to urban green infrastructure
2012420 citationsAndrew Salisbury, A. J. Halstead et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by A. J. Halstead
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of A. J. Halstead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. J. Halstead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. J. Halstead more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. J. Halstead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. J. Halstead. The network helps show where A. J. Halstead may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. J. Halstead
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. J. Halstead.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. J. Halstead based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. J. Halstead. A. J. Halstead is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Salisbury, Andrew, Chris Malumphy, & A. J. Halstead. (2013). Euonymus scale Unaspis euonymi (Hemiptera: Diaspididae); an introduced pest of spindle (Euonymus) in Britain.. 26(4). 211–217.2 indexed citations
2.
Malumphy, Chris & A. J. Halstead. (2012). First incursions in Europe of four Australasian species of armoured scale insect (Hemiptera: Diaspididae).. 25(4). 193–197.2 indexed citations
3.
Salisbury, Andrew, Chris Malumphy, & A. J. Halstead. (2011). First incursions of Aloea australis (Hemiptera: Miridae) and Pulvinaria delottoi (Hemiptera: Coccidae) in Europe, and three other hemipteran insects imported from South Africa.. 24(4). 217–220.3 indexed citations
4.
Salisbury, Andrew, Chris Malumphy, & A. J. Halstead. (2011). PITTOSPORUM PSYLLID TRIOZA VITREORADIATA (HEMIPTERA: TRIOZIDAE) EXPANDING DISTRIBUTION AND HOST RANGE IN THE UK. 24(2). 69–73.2 indexed citations
5.
Halstead, A. J.. (2011). Some recently established pests of ornamental plants.. 10(1). 36–43.1 indexed citations
6.
Malumphy, Chris & A. J. Halstead. (2010). First incursion of white euphorbia scale Selenaspidus albus (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in Britain, with a review of Selenaspidus species found in Britain.. 23(1). 45–50.1 indexed citations
7.
Salisbury, Andrew, A. J. Halstead, & Chris Malumphy. (2010). Wisteria scale, Eulecanium excrescens (Hemiptera: Coccidae) spreading in south east England.. 23(4). 225–228.1 indexed citations
8.
Salisbury, Andrew, Maxwell V. L. Barclay, Sharon Reid, & A. J. Halstead. (2009). The current status of the southern green shield bug, Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), an introduced pest species recently established in south-east England.. 22(3). 189–194.7 indexed citations
9.
Halstead, A. J.. (2009). Host plants of a leaf-mining sawfly, Parna apicalis (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) in Britain.. 22(1). 47–48.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.