Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis
2006752 citationsJean Bourhis, Jens Overgaard et al.The Lancetprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A Hliniak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Hliniak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Hliniak more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A Hliniak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A Hliniak. The network helps show where A Hliniak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A Hliniak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A Hliniak.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A Hliniak based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A Hliniak. A Hliniak is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bourhis, Jean, Jens Overgaard, Hélène Audry, et al.. (2006). Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis. The Lancet. 368(9538). 843–854.752 indexed citations breakdown →
Hliniak, A, et al.. (2002). Radiotherapy outcomes in laryngeal cancer - a retrospective study. Nowotwory Journal of Oncology. 52(2). 111–111.1 indexed citations
6.
Maciejewski, B., R. Tarnawski, Leszek Miszczyk, A Hliniak, & Rafał Suwiński. (2001). To the ranch and back - benefits vs. costs in altered radiotherapy for head and neck cancers*. Nowotwory Journal of Oncology. 51(1). 11–11.1 indexed citations
Zajusz, A., B. Maciejewski, & A Hliniak. (1995). Normobaric oxygen as a sensitizer in radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer.. PubMed. 42(3). 137–40.1 indexed citations
9.
Iżewska, J., et al.. (1995). External audit on output calibration for photon beams (Polish participation in pan-European Radiation Oncology Project for Assurance of Treatment Quality). 1(1). 11–23.1 indexed citations
Skoczylas, Jacek, Krzysztof Bujko, A Hliniak, & Antoni Osmólski. (1992). Concomitant boost radiotherapy of supraglottic cancer--preliminary results, morbidity.. PubMed. 39(2). 119–22.2 indexed citations
12.
Zgliczyński, S, et al.. (1992). [Results of 3-stage treatment: (I) corticotherapy, (II) linear acceleration and (III) orbital decompression in 206 patients with malignant Graves ophthalmopathy].. PubMed. 43(3). 274–86.2 indexed citations
Hliniak, A, et al.. (1990). [Comparison of the effectiveness of different methods of irradiation using metronidazole as a radiation-sensitizing agent in patients with laryngeal cancer. Controlled clinical studies].. PubMed. 39(2). 111–5.3 indexed citations
Hliniak, A, et al.. (1972). Ultrastructural studies on the behaviour of macrophages in the course of X-ray therapy of human skin cancer.. PubMed. 43(2). 270–80.3 indexed citations
19.
Hliniak, A, et al.. (1966). Long-term results and complications after the irradiation of haemangiomas in children.. PubMed. 7(2). 141–4.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.