A. Hatayama

2.5k total citations
214 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

A. Hatayama is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Hatayama has authored 214 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 133 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 125 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 117 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in A. Hatayama's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (132 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (117 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (110 papers). A. Hatayama is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (132 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (117 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (110 papers). A. Hatayama collaborates with scholars based in Japan, Switzerland and France. A. Hatayama's co-authors include K. Miyamoto, M. Bacal, Y. Homma, K. Hoshino, J. Lettry, M. Hanada, S. Mattei, R. Schneider, Takashi Inoue and M. Kashiwagi and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and Journal of Computational Physics.

In The Last Decade

A. Hatayama

199 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A. Hatayama Japan	19	1.1k	1.1k	1.1k	461	347	214	1.7k
P. McNeely Germany	24	1.3k 1.2×	1.5k 1.4×	1.5k 1.5×	246 0.5×	442 1.3×	73	2.0k
E. Speth Germany	24	1.3k 1.2×	1.6k 1.4×	1.6k 1.6×	187 0.4×	398 1.1×	72	2.0k
B. Heinemann Germany	25	1.6k 1.4×	1.6k 1.4×	1.8k 1.7×	178 0.4×	287 0.8×	104	2.1k
R. H. Goulding United States	20	839 0.7×	1.0k 0.9×	600 0.6×	392 0.9×	180 0.5×	147	1.4k
K. Watanabe Japan	25	1.2k 1.0×	1.3k 1.2×	1.5k 1.4×	263 0.6×	248 0.7×	191	2.0k
L. Grisham United States	17	468 0.4×	851 0.8×	690 0.7×	218 0.5×	262 0.8×	113	1.2k
O. Kaneko Japan	22	892 0.8×	1.3k 1.2×	1.1k 1.0×	315 0.7×	245 0.7×	148	1.7k
Elizabeth Surrey United Kingdom	17	484 0.4×	592 0.5×	634 0.6×	265 0.6×	148 0.4×	123	1.0k
W. Kraus Germany	27	1.9k 1.7×	1.8k 1.7×	2.2k 2.1×	121 0.3×	381 1.1×	91	2.4k
H.P.L. de Esch France	18	849 0.8×	1.2k 1.1×	1.2k 1.1×	267 0.6×	183 0.5×	66	1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by A. Hatayama

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Hatayama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Hatayama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Hatayama more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Hatayama

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Hatayama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Hatayama. The network helps show where A. Hatayama may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Hatayama

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Hatayama. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Hatayama based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Hatayama. A. Hatayama is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Bowden, M., et al.. (2023). The development of a zero-dimensional collisional-radiative model for interpreting plasma emission in low temperature divertor plasmas in tokamaks. Frontiers in Physics. 11. 2 indexed citations

Miyamoto, K., et al.. (2022). Analysis of the plasma meniscus in a hydrogen electronegative plasma. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 31(10). 105012–105012. 2 indexed citations

Tanaka, H., N. Ohno, Shin Kajita, et al.. (2020). Detached helium plasma simulation by a one-dimensional fluid code with detailed collisional-radiative model. Physics of Plasmas. 27(10). 14 indexed citations

Nakashima, Y., A. Hatayama, Seiji Ishiguro, et al.. (2019). Study of end-cell plasma parameters of GAMMA 10/PDX by the LINDA code. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 61(12). 125005–125005. 8 indexed citations

Abe, Shota, et al.. (2018). Integrated modeling of the beam formation and extraction in the Linac4 hydrogen negative ion source. AIP conference proceedings. 2011. 80017–80017. 2 indexed citations

Nakashima, Y., et al.. (2018). Numerical simulation study towards plasma detachment in the end cell of GAMMA 10/PDX by a coupled fluid‐neutral code. Contributions to Plasma Physics. 58(6-8). 805–811. 4 indexed citations

Nakashima, Y., A. Hatayama, K. Ichimura, et al.. (2017). Numerical simulation of detached plasma in the end-cell of GAMMA 10/PDX for divertor simulation study. Fusion Engineering and Design. 125. 216–221. 11 indexed citations

Bonnin, X., Y. Homma, Hiroaki Inoue, et al.. (2017). Kinetic modeling of high-Ztungsten impurity transport in ITER plasmas using the IMPGYRO code in the trace impurity limit. Nuclear Fusion. 57(11). 116051–116051. 25 indexed citations

Mattei, S., et al.. (2017). A fully-implicit Particle-In-Cell Monte Carlo Collision code for the simulation of inductively coupled plasmas. Journal of Computational Physics. 350. 891–906. 38 indexed citations

10.

Mattei, S., et al.. (2015). Initial results of a full kinetic simulation of RF H− source including Coulomb collision process. AIP conference proceedings. 1655. 20016–20016. 9 indexed citations

11.

Goto, Isao, et al.. (2015). Study of the negative ion extraction mechanism from a double-ion plasma in negative ion sources. AIP conference proceedings. 1655. 20011–20011. 2 indexed citations

12.

Hatayama, A., M. Ohta, Masaru Yasumoto, et al.. (2014). Kinetic modeling of particle dynamics in H− negative ion sources (invited). Review of Scientific Instruments. 85(2). 02A510–02A510. 6 indexed citations

13.

Miyamoto, K., et al.. (2013). Study of beam optics and beam halo by integrated modeling of negative ion beams from plasma meniscus formation to beam acceleration. Applied Physics Letters. 102(2). 24 indexed citations

14.

Hoshino, K., et al.. (2009). Coupled IMPGYRO-EDDY simulation of tungsten impurity transport in tokamak geometry. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 390-391. 207–210. 9 indexed citations

15.

Sagara, A., et al.. (2008). The Fusion Reactor Wall is Getting Hot!―A Challenge towards the Future for Numerical Modelling（１）. Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan. 50(6). 378–383.

16.

Hiwatari, Ryoji, A. Hatayama, & T. Takizuka. (2008). Effect of SOL Decay Length on Modeling of Divertor Detachment by Using Simple Core‐SOL‐Divertor Model. Contributions to Plasma Physics. 48(1-3). 174–178. 1 indexed citations

17.

Miyamoto, K., et al.. (2003). Effect of transport on MAR in detached divertor plasma. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 313-316. 1036–1040. 7 indexed citations

18.

Yoshida, Zensho, et al.. (1993). Design of a Sawtooth-Free Plasma in an Inductively-Operated Pulsed Tokamak Reactor. 69(10). 1200–1207. 1 indexed citations

19.

Yamaoka, Mitsuaki, M. Yamauchi, A. Hatayama, et al.. (1989). Parametric study on blanket neutronics and economics of fusion—fission hybrid reactors. Fusion Engineering and Design. 10. 87–93. 1 indexed citations

20.

Saito, Seiji, et al.. (1982). Plasma design considerations of near term tokamak fusion experimental reactor.. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 19(8). 628–637. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact