A. E. H. Love

11.4k total citations
3 papers, 195 citations indexed

About

A. E. H. Love is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Oceanography and Geochemistry and Petrology. According to data from OpenAlex, A. E. H. Love has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 195 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Mechanics of Materials, 1 paper in Oceanography and 1 paper in Geochemistry and Petrology. Recurrent topics in A. E. H. Love's work include Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (1 paper), Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering (1 paper) and Geological Modeling and Analysis (1 paper). A. E. H. Love is often cited by papers focused on Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (1 paper), Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering (1 paper) and Geological Modeling and Analysis (1 paper). A. E. H. Love collaborates with scholars based in . A. E. H. Love's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Project Euclid (Cornell University) and Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).

In The Last Decade

A. E. H. Love

3 papers receiving 184 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A. E. H. Love	2	88	66	40	34	32	3	195
Ben H. Tan Australia	6	50 0.6×	505 7.7×	57 1.4×	20 0.6×	32 1.0×	10	616
Г. А. Марков Russia	10	66 0.8×	100 1.5×	193 4.8×	6 0.2×	6 0.2×	50	340
С. И. Козлов Russia	7	34 0.4×	50 0.8×	159 4.0×	10 0.3×	5 0.2×	46	265
Takuji Yamada Japan	9	44 0.5×	277 4.2×	19 0.5×	42 1.2×	2 0.1×	24	386
S. Vanaverbeke Belgium	8	48 0.5×	13 0.2×	84 2.1×	9 0.3×	24 0.8×	20	170
T. Jordan United States	6	27 0.3×	321 4.9×	20 0.5×	5 0.1×	7 0.2×	10	357
E. B. Mayfield United States	7	75 0.9×	24 0.4×	96 2.4×	5 0.1×	25 0.8×	24	313
Siyuan Zou China	6	25 0.3×	158 2.4×	2 0.1×	18 0.5×	68 2.1×	18	322
H. Sakai Japan	9	18 0.2×	23 0.3×	36 0.9×	4 0.1×	6 0.2×	23	190
Kuangdai Leng United Kingdom	12	32 0.4×	314 4.8×	38 0.9×	4 0.1×	6 0.2×	32	395

Countries citing papers authored by A. E. H. Love

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. E. H. Love's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. E. H. Love with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. E. H. Love more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. E. H. Love

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. E. H. Love. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. E. H. Love. The network helps show where A. E. H. Love may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

3 of 3 papers shown

1.

Love, A. E. H.. (2013). Some Problems of Geodynamics. 141 indexed citations

2.

Love, A. E. H.. (2010). Some Problems of Geodynamics; Being an Essay to Which the Adams Prize in the University of Cambridge Was Adjudged in 1911. Project Euclid (Cornell University). 53 indexed citations

3.

Love, A. E. H.. (2007). Theoretical Mechanics, An Introductory Treatise On The Principles Of Dynamics: With Applications And Numerous Examples. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact