A. Durocher

1.8k total citations
56 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

A. Durocher is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Durocher has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Materials Chemistry, 21 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 20 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in A. Durocher's work include Fusion materials and technologies (43 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (21 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (21 papers). A. Durocher is often cited by papers focused on Fusion materials and technologies (43 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (21 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (21 papers). A. Durocher collaborates with scholars based in France, Germany and Spain. A. Durocher's co-authors include F. Escourbiac, M. Merola, Takeshi Hirai, V. Barabash, J. Schlösser, G. Pintsuk, S. Panayotis, B. Riccardi, V. Komarov and L. Ferrand and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Nuclear Materials, Nuclear Fusion and NDT & E International.

In The Last Decade

A. Durocher

55 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. Durocher France 21 1.2k 534 457 367 235 56 1.5k
M. Richou France 23 1.3k 1.2× 471 0.9× 469 1.0× 458 1.2× 196 0.8× 110 1.6k
I. Mazul Russia 24 1.4k 1.2× 705 1.3× 498 1.1× 363 1.0× 251 1.1× 113 1.7k
M. Missirlian France 20 1.0k 0.9× 274 0.5× 648 1.4× 377 1.0× 133 0.6× 97 1.3k
K. Ezato Japan 19 993 0.9× 372 0.7× 302 0.7× 344 0.9× 148 0.6× 76 1.2k
R. Tivey Germany 18 845 0.7× 358 0.7× 401 0.9× 268 0.7× 132 0.6× 61 1.1k
P. Norajitra Germany 25 1.8k 1.6× 776 1.5× 537 1.2× 780 2.1× 236 1.0× 88 2.2k
M. Rödig Germany 20 1.2k 1.0× 482 0.9× 377 0.8× 174 0.5× 241 1.0× 68 1.3k
D. Maisonnier Germany 20 1.0k 0.9× 229 0.4× 539 1.2× 511 1.4× 93 0.4× 70 1.4k
S. Sharafat United States 22 1.0k 0.9× 316 0.6× 235 0.5× 347 0.9× 167 0.7× 69 1.3k
G. Vieider Germany 17 864 0.7× 443 0.8× 226 0.5× 225 0.6× 208 0.9× 53 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by A. Durocher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Durocher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Durocher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Durocher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Durocher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Durocher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Durocher. The network helps show where A. Durocher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Durocher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Durocher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Durocher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Durocher. A. Durocher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gavila, P., M. Grattarola, E. Visca, et al.. (2020). Status of the ITER Divertor IVT procurement. Fusion Engineering and Design. 160. 111973–111973. 7 indexed citations
2.
Escourbiac, F., A. Durocher, A. M. Fedosov, et al.. (2019). Assessment of critical heat flux margins on tungsten monoblocks of the ITER divertor vertical targets. Fusion Engineering and Design. 146. 2036–2039. 35 indexed citations
3.
Hirai, Takeshi, S. Carpentier‐Chouchana, F. Escourbiac, et al.. (2017). Design optimization of the ITER tungsten divertor vertical targets. Fusion Engineering and Design. 127. 66–72. 58 indexed citations
4.
Hirai, Takeshi, S. Panayotis, V. Barabash, et al.. (2016). Use of tungsten material for the ITER divertor. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 9. 616–622. 268 indexed citations
5.
Panayotis, S., Takeshi Hirai, V. Barabash, et al.. (2016). Self-castellation of tungsten monoblock under high heat flux loading and impact of material properties. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 12. 200–204. 52 indexed citations
6.
Hirai, Takeshi, F. Escourbiac, V. Barabash, et al.. (2014). Status of technology R&D for the ITER tungsten divertor monoblock. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 463. 1248–1251. 115 indexed citations
7.
Durocher, A., F. Escourbiac, Jonathan Farjon, et al.. (2009). An operational non-destructive examination technique for ITER Divertor plasma facing components. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 386-388. 860–862. 5 indexed citations
8.
Richou, M., et al.. (2009). Data merging of infrared and ultrasonic images for plasma facing components inspection. Fusion Engineering and Design. 84(7-11). 1593–1597. 8 indexed citations
9.
Durocher, A., F. Escourbiac, M. Richou, et al.. (2009). Infrared thermography inspection of the ITER vertical target qualification prototypes manufactured by European industry using SATIR. Fusion Engineering and Design. 84(2-6). 314–318. 19 indexed citations
10.
Durocher, A., J. Moysan, F. Escourbiac, et al.. (2007). Infrared images data merging for plasma-facing component inspection. Fusion Engineering and Design. 82(15-24). 1694–1699. 5 indexed citations
11.
Moysan, J., et al.. (2007). Improvement of the non-destructive evaluation of plasma facing components by data combination of infrared thermal images. NDT & E International. 40(6). 478–485. 12 indexed citations
12.
Schlösser, J., M. Merola, A. Durocher, et al.. (2006). Acceptance criteria for the ITER divertor vertical target. Fusion Engineering and Design. 81(1-7). 265–268. 16 indexed citations
13.
Escourbiac, F., et al.. (2006). High heat flux testing impact on the tore supra toroidal pumped limiter achievement. 92–95. 4 indexed citations
14.
Missirlian, M., et al.. (2005). Results and analysis of high heat flux tests on a full-scale vertical target prototype of ITER divertor. Fusion Engineering and Design. 75-79. 435–440. 15 indexed citations
15.
Durocher, A., M. Lipa, P. Chappuis, G. Martín, & J.J. Cordier. (2004). Rupture analysis of CuCrZr plasma facing component during a loss of flow accident in Tore-Supra. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 329-333. 914–918. 2 indexed citations
16.
Libeyre, P., P. Garin, G. Agarici, et al.. (2003). Spin-off from Euratom-CEA association in fusion magnetic research. Fusion Engineering and Design. 69(1-4). 807–811. 2 indexed citations
17.
Schlösser, J., A. Durocher, P. Chappuis, et al.. (2002). Material properties and consequences on the quality of tore supra plasma facing components. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 307-311. 686–690. 16 indexed citations
18.
Durocher, A., et al.. (2002). TORE SUPRA experience of copper chromium zirconium electron beam welding. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 307-311. 1554–1557. 20 indexed citations
19.
Schlösser, J., et al.. (2001). Experience feedback from high heat flux component manufacturing for Tore Supra. Fusion Engineering and Design. 56-57. 309–313. 32 indexed citations
20.
Bibet, P., G. Agarici, M. Chantant, et al.. (2000). New advanced launcher for lower hybrid current drive on Tore Supra. Fusion Engineering and Design. 51-52. 741–746. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026