A. De Santis

15 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers

A. De Santis
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 122
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 140
  • Molecular Medicine 27
  • Inorganic Chemistry 72
  • Immunology and Allergy 31
Replace Zhenzhen Chen with:
Zhenzhen Chen China
Mary T. Kelly Ireland
Carla Moutinho Portugal
Jitendra K. Malik India
Pavel Karásek Czechia
Kathleen L. Chan United States
Dunia A. Al Farraj Saudi Arabia
Biljana Arsić Serbia
Danilo Corradini Italy
Mujeeb Ur Rahman China
A. De Santis relative to Zhenzhen Chen China Zhenzhen Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Zhenzhen Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. De Santis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. De Santis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. De Santis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. De Santis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. De Santis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. De Santis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. De Santis. The network helps show where A. De Santis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. De Santis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. De Santis Line = papers co-authored together A. De Santis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2003127
2 2003112
3 2017102
4 200565
5 197337
6 201135
7 200234
8 197327
9 202215
10 202114
11 200513
12 200610
13 200210
14 20079
15
Traditional and supercritical CO2 extraction of the volatiles from Narcissus poeticus L.
20094

About A. De Santis

A. De Santis is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (4 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (3 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (2 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (2 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (2 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (2 papers) and Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (122 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (140 citations), Molecular Medicine (27 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (72 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (31 citations). A. De Santis has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Rita Romani, R. Liantonio, Giuseppe Resnati, Pierangelo Metrangolo, Cinzia Antognelli, Tullio Pilati, Alessandra Forni, Elvio Giovannini, Gabriella Rosi and Gloria Isani. Their work appears in journals such as Plant and Cell Physiology, Chemico-Biological Interactions, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Energies and Journal of Sleep Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact