A. D. Gilliam

411 total citations
12 papers, 250 citations indexed

About

A. D. Gilliam is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology. According to data from OpenAlex, A. D. Gilliam has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 250 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Gastroenterology. Recurrent topics in A. D. Gilliam's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (3 papers) and Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (3 papers). A. D. Gilliam is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (3 papers) and Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (3 papers). A. D. Gilliam collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. A. D. Gilliam's co-authors include Sue‐Ann Watson, Ian J. Beckingham, Liam Horgan, Dileep N. Lobo, J H Scholefield, Stephen E. Attwood, William J. Speake, V Shanmugam, Y K S Viswanath and Talvinder Gill and has published in prestigious journals such as British journal of surgery, Surgical Endoscopy and European Journal of Surgical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

A. D. Gilliam

12 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

A. D. Gilliam

SURGE

ONCOL

GASTR

PRM

GHP

Nobel Chowdhury United States

Hani Jawa Saudi Arabia

Tehseen Salimi United States

Giuseppe Macrí Italy

Sho Asonuma Japan

Richard Moses United States

Pietro Genova France

Claire Dupont France

Joana Roseira Portugal

Matteo Novello Italy

Nobel Chowdhury United States

A. D. Gilliam

105 ×0.7

SURGE

21 ×0.3

ONCOL

95 ×1.4

GASTR

20 ×0.6

PRM

41 ×1.4

GHP

Citations per year, relative to A. D. Gilliam A. D. Gilliam (= 1×) peers Nobel Chowdhury

Countries citing papers authored by A. D. Gilliam

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. D. Gilliam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. D. Gilliam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. D. Gilliam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. D. Gilliam

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. D. Gilliam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. D. Gilliam. The network helps show where A. D. Gilliam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. D. Gilliam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. D. Gilliam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. D. Gilliam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. D. Gilliam. A. D. Gilliam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Viswanath, Y K S, et al.. (2018). ‘Mesh hiatal hernioplasty’ versus ‘suture cruroplasty’ in laparoscopic para-oesophageal hernia surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Journal of Surgery. 42(1). 53–60. 43 indexed citations

2.

Gilliam, A. D., et al.. (2008). Day-case laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surgical Endoscopy. 23(8). 1745–1749. 15 indexed citations

3.

Gilliam, A. D., et al.. (2008). Avoidance of tattoo disruption: a further benefit of laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 23(2). 318–320. 6 indexed citations

4.

Gilliam, A. D. & Sue‐Ann Watson. (2007). G17DT: an antigastrin immunogen for the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancy. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy. 7(3). 397–404. 30 indexed citations

5.

Gilliam, A. D., et al.. (2007). Day case emergency laparoscopic appendectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 22(2). 483–486. 27 indexed citations

6.

Takhar, Arjun, et al.. (2005). The effect of jaundice on the generation of anti-gastrin antibodies in G17DT immunized patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 32(2). 197–200. 4 indexed citations

7.

Gilliam, A. D., et al.. (2005). Day-case breast cancer axillary surgery. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 87(2). 96–98. 22 indexed citations

8.

Gilliam, A. D., S A Watson, Andrew J. McKenzie, et al.. (2004). A phase II study of G17DT in gastric carcinoma. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 30(5). 536–543. 39 indexed citations

9.

Gough, Martin, A. D. Gilliam, C J Stoddard, & Roger Ackroyd. (2003). Barrett’s esophagus: patient information and the Internet. the patient’s perspective. Diseases of the Esophagus. 16(2). 57–59. 8 indexed citations

10.

Gilliam, A. D., Dileep N. Lobo, Brian J. Rowlands, & Ian J. Beckingham. (2003). The ‘two-week’ target for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma: an achievable aim?. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 29(7). 575–579. 8 indexed citations

11.

Gilliam, A. D., et al.. (2003). Finding the best from the rest: evaluation of the quality of patient information on the Internet. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 85(1). 44–46. 26 indexed citations

12.

Gilliam, A. D., William J. Speake, Dileep N. Lobo, & Ian J. Beckingham. (2003). Current practice of emergency vagotomy and Helicobacter pylori eradication for complicated peptic ulcer in the United Kingdom. British journal of surgery. 90(1). 88–90. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact