A. Chłopik

3.5k total citations
9 papers, 10 citations indexed

About

A. Chłopik is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Chłopik has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 10 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 4 papers in Radiation and 4 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in A. Chłopik's work include Particle Detector Development and Performance (6 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (4 papers). A. Chłopik is often cited by papers focused on Particle Detector Development and Performance (6 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (4 papers). A. Chłopik collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland and Poland. A. Chłopik's co-authors include Z. Guzik, A. Kerek, B. Jost, M. Moszyński, R. Jacobsson, D. Dąbrowski, Z. Guzik, F. Formenti, P. Kankiewicz and A. Lacourt and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement and CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

In The Last Decade

A. Chłopik

5 papers receiving 9 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. Chłopik Switzerland 3 6 4 2 2 1 9 10
M. von Hodenberg Germany 2 7 1.2× 5 1.3× 2 1.0× 2 1.0× 2 12
F. Karstens Germany 2 7 1.2× 5 1.3× 2 1.0× 3 1.5× 1 1.0× 3 13
V. Savinov United States 3 5 0.8× 3 0.8× 2 1.0× 1 0.5× 1 1.0× 6 9
A. Kavelaars United States 2 5 0.8× 3 0.8× 2 1.0× 3 10
A. Rostovtsev Russia 2 7 1.2× 3 0.8× 2 1.0× 3 11
K. A. Drees United States 2 7 1.2× 4 1.0× 2 1.0× 4 9
R. Partridge United States 2 6 1.0× 6 1.5× 2 1.0× 3 1.5× 2 13
Dinyar Rabady Austria 3 5 0.8× 4 1.0× 2 1.0× 1 1.0× 3 6
P. Krieger Canada 2 4 0.7× 4 1.0× 2 1.0× 1 1.0× 7 11
J. Višniakov Switzerland 2 4 0.7× 5 1.3× 2 1.0× 3 6

Countries citing papers authored by A. Chłopik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Chłopik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Chłopik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Chłopik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Chłopik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Chłopik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Chłopik. The network helps show where A. Chłopik may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Chłopik

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Chłopik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Chłopik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Chłopik. A. Chłopik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Chłopik, A., et al.. (2021). The Dosimetry Protection of the MPD Electronic Equipment at the New NICA Collider — the Prototype System. Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement. 14(3). 549–549.
2.
Kankiewicz, P., et al.. (2021). Minimum Resolution of MCORD as a Consequence of Astrophysical Observation Requirements. Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement. 14(3). 543–543. 1 indexed citations
3.
Chłopik, A., et al.. (2018). The Prototype Dosimetry System to Protect NICA Slow Control Electronic Equipment. Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement. 11(4). 745–745.
4.
Jacobsson, R., Peter König, Z. Guzik, & A. Chłopik. (2002). The final LHCb readout supervisor "ODIN". CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
5.
Jacobsson, R., B. Jost, Z. Guzik, & A. Chłopik. (2001). The LHCb Timing and Fast Control system. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2 indexed citations
6.
Jacobsson, R., Z. Guzik, & A. Chłopik. (2001). Implementation Issues of the LHCb Readout Supervisor. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
7.
Guzik, Z., et al.. (2000). RISC mezzanines for controlling data acquisition in the NA48 experiment at CERN. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 452(1-2). 289–297.
8.
Guzik, Z., A. Chłopik, F. Formenti, A. Gianoli, & O. Vossnack. (1999). Control and synchronization of the krypton calorimeter pipeline digitizer in NA48 experiment at CERN. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 427(3). 574–582. 2 indexed citations
9.
Chłopik, A., et al.. (1991). A fast charge integrating ADC for the CPLEAR experiment at CERN. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 301(3). 424–434. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026