Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Topological Quantum Effects for Neutral Particles
1984874 citationsYakir Aharonov, A. CasherPhysical Review Lettersprofile →
Chiral symmetry breaking in confining theories
1980580 citationsA. Casher et al.Nuclear Physics Bprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Casher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Casher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Casher more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Casher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Casher. The network helps show where A. Casher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Casher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Casher.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Casher based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. Casher. A. Casher is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Casher, A., et al.. (2011). . Acta Physica Polonica B. 42(6). 1207–1207.1 indexed citations
Aharonov, Yakir, David Z. Albert, A. Casher, & Lev Vaidman. (1987). Surprising quantum effects. Physics Letters A. 124(4-5). 199–203.55 indexed citations
Aharonov, Yakir, A. Casher, & S. Yankielowicz. (1984). Topological singularities and supersymmetry breaking. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 30(2). 386–390.11 indexed citations
Casher, A., Herbert Neuberger, & S. Nussinov. (1979). Chromoelectric-flux-tube model of particle production. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 20(1). 179–188.357 indexed citations
Casher, A.. (1976). Gauge fields on the null plane. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 14(2). 452–464.63 indexed citations
14.
Casher, A., John B. Kogut, & Leonard Susskind. (1974). Vacuum polarization and the absence of free quarks. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 10(2). 732–745.250 indexed citations
15.
Casher, A., S. Nussinov, & Lawrence Susskind. (1973). New effects in the ISR region. Physics Letters B. 44(6). 511–514.8 indexed citations
Susskind, Leonard, A. Casher, & John B. Kogut. (1973). Model of Nonstrange Currents and Mesons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 8(12). 4448–4456.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.