A. C. Armstrong

1.4k total citations
68 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

A. C. Armstrong is a scholar working on Civil and Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, A. C. Armstrong has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering, 19 papers in Environmental Engineering and 17 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in A. C. Armstrong's work include Soil and Unsaturated Flow (27 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (16 papers) and Groundwater flow and contamination studies (14 papers). A. C. Armstrong is often cited by papers focused on Soil and Unsaturated Flow (27 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (16 papers) and Groundwater flow and contamination studies (14 papers). A. C. Armstrong collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Malaysia. A. C. Armstrong's co-authors include E. A. Garwood, D. Scholefield, K. Tyson, J. M. B. Hawkins, A. C. Stone, Mark Robinson, P.B. Leeds‐Harrison, G. L. Harris, J. A. Catt and David Parsons and has published in prestigious journals such as Global Change Biology, Journal of Environmental Management and Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment.

In The Last Decade

A. C. Armstrong

64 papers receiving 911 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. C. Armstrong United Kingdom 19 430 340 244 239 221 68 1.0k
V. Rasiah Canada 23 552 1.3× 205 0.6× 165 0.7× 141 0.6× 405 1.8× 63 1.2k
D. M. Silburn Australia 23 477 1.1× 189 0.6× 314 1.3× 315 1.3× 178 0.8× 49 1.2k
H. W. Rees Canada 28 948 2.2× 251 0.7× 347 1.4× 414 1.7× 182 0.8× 53 1.6k
WE Cotching Australia 18 434 1.0× 132 0.4× 117 0.5× 142 0.6× 276 1.2× 56 802
G. H. Dunn United States 14 675 1.6× 227 0.7× 217 0.9× 82 0.3× 367 1.7× 25 1.2k
T. J. Sauer United States 21 564 1.3× 251 0.7× 167 0.7× 213 0.9× 207 0.9× 56 1.4k
W. Towers United Kingdom 20 467 1.1× 167 0.5× 327 1.3× 70 0.3× 138 0.6× 41 1.2k
B. J. Barfield United States 18 684 1.6× 243 0.7× 446 1.8× 529 2.2× 154 0.7× 95 1.3k
Jialiang Tang China 21 586 1.4× 388 1.1× 213 0.9× 569 2.4× 143 0.6× 61 1.4k
S. Mostaghimi United States 14 590 1.4× 509 1.5× 278 1.1× 536 2.2× 93 0.4× 28 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by A. C. Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. C. Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. C. Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. C. Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. C. Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. C. Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. C. Armstrong. The network helps show where A. C. Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. C. Armstrong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. C. Armstrong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. C. Armstrong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. C. Armstrong. A. C. Armstrong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Armstrong, A. C.. (2009). Further ideas towards a water ethic.. 2(1). 138–147. 6 indexed citations
2.
Armstrong, A. C., et al.. (2004). Mapping the risk to groundwater resources from farm waste stores in England and Wales. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology. 37(4). 293–300. 3 indexed citations
3.
Armstrong, A. C.. (2003). Hydrologic and Geomorphologic Assessment of Debris Flow Events for Mount Hood Highway. EGS - AGU - EUG Joint Assembly. 7531. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gooddy, Daren C., Andrew Hughes, A.T. Williams, et al.. (2001). Field and modelling studies to assess the risk to UK groundwater from earth‐based stores for livestock manure. Soil Use and Management. 17(2). 128–137. 21 indexed citations
5.
Armstrong, A. C., P.B. Leeds‐Harrison, G. L. Harris, & J. A. Catt. (1999). Measurement of solute fluxes in macroporous soils: techniques, problems and precision. Soil Use and Management. 15(4). 240–246. 19 indexed citations
6.
Armstrong, A. C. & S.C. Rose. (1999). Ditch water levels manages for environmental aims: effects on field soil water regimes. Hydrology and earth system sciences. 3(3). 385–394. 12 indexed citations
7.
Treweek, Jo, J. O. Mountford, S. J. Manchester, et al.. (1998). Wetland restoration research in Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 1 indexed citations
8.
Mountford, J. O., J. R. B. Tallowin, Tim H. Sparks, et al.. (1997). Experimental and monitoring studies of the use of raised water-levels for grassland rehabilitation in lowland ESAs. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 3 indexed citations
9.
Hardwick, N. V., A. C. Armstrong, P. Gladders, et al.. (1996). The impact of climate change on crop pests and diseases.. Aspects of applied biology. 261–268. 1 indexed citations
10.
Rounsevell, Mark, P. J. Loveland, T. R. Mayr, et al.. (1996). ACCESS: a spatially-distributed, soil water and crop development model for climate change research. DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)). 45. 85–92. 3 indexed citations
11.
Hodgkinson, R. A., A. C. Armstrong, M. G. Anderson, & S. M. Brooks. (1996). Field studies of runoff processes on restored land in South Wales and the design of channels for erosion control. 613–633. 2 indexed citations
12.
Armstrong, A. C., et al.. (1996). Modelling pesticide and nitrate leaching from cracked clay soils using the CRACK-NP model. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 1 indexed citations
13.
Armstrong, A. C., et al.. (1995). Drainage models to predict soil water regimes in drained soils: a UK perspective. Irrigation and Drainage Systems. 9(3). 205–215. 2 indexed citations
14.
Tyson, K., E. A. Garwood, A. C. Armstrong, & D. Scholefield. (1992). Effects of field drainage on the growth of herbage and the liveweight gain of grazing beef cattle. Grass and Forage Science. 47(3). 290–301. 23 indexed citations
15.
Armstrong, A. C., et al.. (1990). A model for investment appraisal of grassland drainage schemes on farms in the U.K.. Agricultural Water Management. 18(2). 101–120. 9 indexed citations
16.
Armstrong, A. C.. (1987). Slopes, boundary conditions, and the development of convexo‐concave forms—some numerical experiments. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 12(1). 17–30. 26 indexed citations
17.
Armstrong, A. C.. (1986). Mole drainage of a Hallsworth Series soil. Soil Use and Management. 2(2). 54–58. 9 indexed citations
18.
Armstrong, A. C., et al.. (1986). Field measurements of grassland poaching. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 106(1). 67–73. 10 indexed citations
19.
Armstrong, A. C.. (1980). Soils and slopes in a humid temperate environment: A simulation study. CATENA. 7(4). 327–338. 14 indexed citations
20.
Armstrong, A. C.. (1975). Methodological Questions in the Digitised Analysis of ERTS Data. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 28. 608.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026