A Arscott

404 total citations
8 papers, 276 citations indexed

About

A Arscott is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, A Arscott has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 276 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in A Arscott's work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (3 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (2 papers) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers). A Arscott is often cited by papers focused on Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (3 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (2 papers) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers). A Arscott collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and India. A Arscott's co-authors include David Turner, Mark Mullee, Helen Smith, George F. Warner, Catherine Hawke, Paul Little, J.A. Lowes, Geraldine Leydon, Kate Rumsby and Sheila Turner and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Health Technology Assessment and Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

A Arscott

8 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A Arscott United Kingdom	5	197	89	84	79	40	8	276
Bart Knottnerus Netherlands	8	167 0.8×	76 0.9×	68 0.8×	52 0.7×	28 0.7×	30	250
Sina Helbig Germany	9	196 1.0×	67 0.8×	57 0.7×	72 0.9×	22 0.6×	20	306
Cordula Lebert Germany	8	208 1.1×	80 0.9×	64 0.8×	88 1.1×	24 0.6×	13	280
Janine Bates United Kingdom	8	173 0.9×	26 0.3×	31 0.4×	42 0.5×	62 1.6×	18	333
Eleanor Perrelli United States	5	262 1.3×	101 1.1×	132 1.6×	65 0.8×	36 0.9×	5	298
Simrati Kaul United States	6	203 1.0×	76 0.9×	31 0.4×	92 1.2×	53 1.3×	8	268
Manuel Madrazo Spain	7	138 0.7×	25 0.3×	27 0.3×	42 0.5×	32 0.8×	20	204
Bong Suk Shim South Korea	13	121 0.6×	192 2.2×	97 1.2×	37 0.5×	17 0.4×	37	370
Musa Kayondo Uganda	8	75 0.4×	51 0.6×	45 0.5×	121 1.5×	5 0.1×	47	281
Lindsey Korbel United States	6	185 0.9×	77 0.9×	16 0.2×	144 1.8×	9 0.2×	7	306

Countries citing papers authored by A Arscott

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A Arscott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Arscott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Arscott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A Arscott

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A Arscott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A Arscott. The network helps show where A Arscott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A Arscott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A Arscott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A Arscott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A Arscott. A Arscott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Little, Paul, Michael Moore, Sheila Turner, et al.. (2010). Effectiveness of five different approaches in management of urinary tract infection: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 340(feb05 1). c199–c199. 141 indexed citations

2.

Little, Paul, Sheila Turner, Kate Rumsby, et al.. (2009). Dipsticks and diagnostic algorithms in urinary tract infection: development and validation, randomised trial, economic analysis, observational cohort and qualitative study. Health Technology Assessment. 13(19). iii–iv, ix. 92 indexed citations

3.

Thorogood, Margaret, et al.. (2002). Matched controls in a case-control study. Does matching by doctor's list mean matching by relative deprivation?. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 5(2). 165–172. 2 indexed citations

4.

Arscott, A, et al.. (2001). Myocardial infarction and oral contraceptives.. PubMed. 16(5). 1117–20. 1 indexed citations

5.

Dunn, Nicholas, A Arscott, & Margaret Thorogood. (2001). The relationship between use of oral contraceptives and myocardial infarction in young women with fatal outcome, compared to those who survive: results from the MICA case-control study. Contraception. 63(2). 65–69. 26 indexed citations

6.

Dunn, N. Ray, A Arscott, Margaret Thorogood, et al.. (2000). Regional variation in incidence and case fatality of myocardial infarction among young women in England, Scotland and Wales. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 54(4). 293–298. 8 indexed citations

7.

Arscott, A, et al.. (2000). Costs of seeking ethics approval before and after the introduction of multicentre research ethics committees. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 93(10). 511–512. 5 indexed citations

8.

Dunn, N. Ray, et al.. (1999). Case and control recruitment, and validation of cases for the MICA case-control study in England, Scotland and Wales. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 8(4). 285–290. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact