Standout Papers

Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods 2007 2026 2013 2019 1.2k
  1. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods (2007)
    Anne G. Copay, Brian R. Subach et al. The Spine Journal
  2. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales (2008)
    Anne G. Copay, Steven D. Glassman et al. The Spine Journal

Immediate Impact

1 by Nobel laureates 2 from Science/Nature 61 standout
Sub-graph 1 of 21

Citing Papers

Osteoarthritis
2025 Standout
Phase I trial of hES cell-derived dopaminergic neurons for Parkinson’s disease
2025 StandoutNature
2 intermediate papers

Works of Thomas C. Schuler being referenced

Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods
2007 Standout

Author Peers

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Thomas C. Schuler 1025 1112 827 12 2.2k
Lloyd A. Hey 1017 1235 933 42 2.4k
Victoria Pennick 666 710 1015 12 2.3k
Geert J. van der Heijden 817 642 1594 39 2.7k
Rick Deyo 1294 752 2229 11 3.1k
Margaret R. Grove 917 1038 600 28 2.7k
Lucien Abenhaim 353 740 922 40 2.4k
Anne Keller 1112 942 1618 54 2.8k
Robin Hashimoto 948 860 670 22 1.8k
Ton Kuijpers 410 839 1308 39 3.0k
Liana D. Castel 588 371 1134 27 2.5k

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless by CCL
2026