Standout Papers

Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodo... 2019 2026 2021 2023 300
  1. Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)
    Siw Waffenschmidt, Marco Knelangen et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology

Immediate Impact

61 standout
Sub-graph 1 of 22

Citing Papers

Pancreatic cancer
2025 Standout
A systematic review of the impact of artificial intelligence on educational outcomes in health professions education
2025 Standout
2 intermediate papers

Works of Stefanie Bühn being referenced

Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review
2019 Standout
The risk of bias in systematic reviews tool showed fair reliability and good construct validity
2017

Author Peers

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Stefanie Bühn 131 60 75 74 29 513
Lara Handler 155 111 133 126 23 500
Michael G. Kendrach 127 44 98 49 23 573
Thomas Keeley 191 259 177 43 20 631
Sana Ishaque 86 78 79 23 15 501
Isabel B. Rodrigues 130 44 122 31 28 624
Angela Gialamas 171 67 99 26 30 628
Orvie Dingwall 93 33 88 76 17 522
Yasser Sami Amer 155 90 207 32 59 490
Zaliha Ismail 62 19 60 22 58 571
Yemi Oluboyede 136 156 55 20 37 598

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless by CCL
2026