Standout Papers

On the reception and dete... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300
What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation benchmark for papers published in the same subfield and year, or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

  1. On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit
    2015 308 citations Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne et al. Judgment and Decision Making profile →

Immediate Impact

5 from Science/Nature 109 hit
Sub-graph 1 of 19

Citing Papers

GPT is an effective tool for multilingual psychological text analysis
2024 Hit
Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research
2024 HitNature
2 intermediate papers

Works of Nathaniel Barr being referenced

The brain in your pocket: Evidence that Smartphones are used to supplant thinking
2015
The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values
2013

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Nathaniel Barr 491 410 198 157 114 15 967
Dustin P. Calvillo 516 1.1× 415 1.0× 185 0.9× 122 0.8× 94 0.8× 37 990
Eryn J. Newman 426 0.9× 314 0.8× 208 1.1× 118 0.8× 72 0.6× 41 1000
Abraham M. Rutchick 579 1.2× 245 0.6× 325 1.6× 161 1.0× 98 0.9× 29 1.1k
Aaron J. Moss 430 0.9× 184 0.4× 255 1.3× 95 0.6× 88 0.8× 19 1.0k
Amy Marcus‐Newhall 618 1.3× 140 0.3× 558 2.8× 90 0.6× 77 0.7× 16 1.1k
Benjamin A. Converse 285 0.6× 208 0.5× 267 1.3× 179 1.1× 51 0.4× 22 847
Yexin Jessica Li 575 1.2× 163 0.4× 360 1.8× 247 1.6× 106 0.9× 26 1.2k
Kathryn C. Oleson 706 1.4× 179 0.4× 556 2.8× 154 1.0× 100 0.9× 25 1.2k
Christopher Jones 666 1.4× 297 0.7× 228 1.2× 188 1.2× 99 0.9× 21 1.1k
Betsy Sparrow 281 0.6× 526 1.3× 224 1.1× 179 1.1× 21 0.2× 11 1.2k

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless by CCL
2026