Standout Papers

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trial... 2008 2026 2014 2020 25.4k
  1. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)
    Julian P. T. Higgins, Doug Altman et al. BMJ
  2. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (2008)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. BMJ
  3. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables (2011)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  4. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)
    Howard Balshem, Mark Helfand et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  5. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012)
    Noah Ivers, Gro Jamtvedt et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  6. What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? (2008)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. BMJ
  7. GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2010)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  8. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  9. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  10. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  11. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias (2011)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  12. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  13. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes (2010)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  14. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (2009)
    Louise Forsetlund, Arild Bjørndal et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  15. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement (2008)
    Merrick Zwarenstein, Shaun Treweek et al. BMJ
  16. Going from evidence to recommendations (2008)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. BMJ
  17. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies (2008)
    Holger J. Schünemann, Andrew D Oxman et al. BMJ
  18. A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers (2009)
    Kevin E. Thorpe, Merrick Zwarenstein et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  19. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  20. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (2007)
    Mary Ann O’Brien, Stephen Rogers et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  21. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations (2013)
    Jeff Andrews, Gordon Guyatt et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  22. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group (2004)
    David C. Atkins, Martin Eccles et al. BMC Health Services Research
  23. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength (2013)
    Jeffrey C Andrews, Holger J. Schünemann et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  24. Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review (2002)
    Simon Innvær, Gunn Elisabeth Vist et al. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
  25. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction (2016)
    Pablo Alonso‐Coello, Holger J. Schünemann et al. BMJ
  26. A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: A systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice (2013)
    Signe Flottorp, Andrew D Oxman et al. Implementation Science
  27. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (2006)
    Gro Jamtvedt, Jane Young et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  28. A Consumer's Guide to Subgroup Analyses (1992)
    Andrew D Oxman, Gordon H. Guyatt Annals of Internal Medicine
  29. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)
    Sally Hopewell, Kirsty Loudon et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  30. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)
    Andrew D Oxman, Gordon Guyatt Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  31. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1994)
    Andrew D Oxman JAMA
  32. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes (2012)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  33. GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes (2012)
    Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  34. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials (1998)
    Regina Kunz, Andrew D Oxman BMJ
  35. Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study (2009)
    Simon Lewin, Claire Glenton et al. BMJ
  36. GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes (2012)
    Gordon Guyatt, Kristian Thorlund et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  37. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines (2016)
    Pablo Alonso‐Coello, Andrew D Oxman et al. BMJ

Immediate Impact

1 by Nobel laureates 2 from Science/Nature 173 standout
Sub-graph 1 of 16

Citing Papers

Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries
2021 Standout
Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions
2019 Standout
13 intermediate papers

Works of Andrew D Oxman being referenced

GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
2011 Standout
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
2008 Standout
and 8 more

Author Peers

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Andrew D Oxman 18682 10554 17410 17864 282 102.0k
Kenneth F. Schulz 10713 8270 16049 16865 210 98.9k
Mike Clarke 12057 6735 15038 21439 582 119.1k
Holger J. Schünemann 9844 8513 14735 14708 693 82.6k
Jan P. Vandenbroucke 9765 5045 14038 21047 439 107.2k
Erik von Elm 9655 4953 12544 17890 130 86.0k
Víctor M. Montori 13626 6911 11803 13008 678 74.4k
P.J. Devereaux 7526 5097 10300 23695 395 91.9k
Paul Glasziou 11692 6976 10787 9945 622 64.4k
Peter C Gøtzsche 18184 10071 24974 39970 276 196.6k
Jos Kleijnen 7009 3607 9753 16793 312 86.4k

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless by CCL
2026