Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
200718.0k citationsErik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman et al.PLoS Medicineprofile →
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
200712.4k citationsErik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman et al.Annals of Internal Medicineprofile →
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
200711.6k citationsErik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman et al.The Lancetprofile →
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
200810.1k citationsErik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman et al.Journal of Clinical Epidemiologyprofile →
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies
20146.8k citationsErik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman et al.International Journal of Surgeryprofile →
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
20076.2k citationsErik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman et al.profile →
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
20076.1k citationsJan P. Vandenbroucke, Erik von Elm et al.PLoS Medicineprofile →
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement
20153.4k citationsEric I. Benchimol, Liam Smeeth et al.PLoS Medicineprofile →
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies
20072.1k citationsErik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman et al.profile →
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)
20071.9k citationsJan P. Vandenbroucke, Erik von Elm et al.Epidemiologyprofile →
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration
20141.9k citationsJan P. Vandenbroucke, Erik von Elm et al.International Journal of Surgeryprofile →
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement
20071.3k citationsErik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman et al.Epidemiologyprofile →
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies*
20071.2k citationsErik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman et al.Bulletin of the World Health Organizationprofile →
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
20081.1k citationsErik von Elm et al.PLoS ONEprofile →
Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts
2007712 citationsErik von Elm et al.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviewsprofile →
The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE)
2018361 citationsSinéad Langan, Irene Petersen et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Erik von Elm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik von Elm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik von Elm more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik von Elm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik von Elm. The network helps show where Erik von Elm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erik von Elm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erik von Elm.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erik von Elm based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Erik von Elm. Erik von Elm is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Benchimol, Eric I., Liam Smeeth, Astrid Guttmann, et al.. (2015). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement. PLoS Medicine. 12(10). e1001885–e1001885.3404 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Elm, Erik von, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger, et al.. (2014). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. International Journal of Surgery. 12(12). 1495–1499.6752 indexed citations breakdown →
Vandenbroucke, Jan P., Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, et al.. (2009). Mejorar la comunicación de estudios observacionales en epidemiología (STROBE): explicación y elaboración Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.28 indexed citations
14.
Elm, Erik von, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger, et al.. (2008). Declaración de la Iniciativa STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology): directrices para la comunicación de estudios observacionales The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
15.
Elm, Erik von, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger, et al.. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet. 370(9596). 1453–1457.11648 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Elm, Erik von, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger, et al.. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies */Declaration De l'Initiative STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) : Recommandations Pour L'elaboration Des Rapports D'etudes Observationnelles/ Declaracion De la Iniciativa STOBE. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 85(11). 867.7 indexed citations
17.
Elm, Erik von, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger, et al.. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. Annals of Internal Medicine. 147(8). 573–577.12444 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Vandenbroucke, Jan P., Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, et al.. (2007). Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). Epidemiology. 18(6). 805–835.1858 indexed citations breakdown →
Elm, Erik von, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger, et al.. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement. Epidemiology. 18(6). 800–804.1336 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.