Countries where authors publish in Zoologica Scripta
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Zoologica Scripta. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Zoologica Scripta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zoologica Scripta more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Zoologica Scripta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Zoologica Scripta.
About Zoologica Scripta
The 2.0k papers published in Zoologica Scripta in the last decades have received a total of 49.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Zoologica Scripta usually cover Paleontology (355 papers), Oceanography (544 papers), Ecology (915 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (663 papers) and Ecological Modeling (106 papers) specifically the topics of Marine Biology and Ecology Research (516 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (272 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (266 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (210 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (176 papers), Plant and animal studies (168 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (166 papers) and Marine Ecology and Invasive Species (141 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Zoologica Scripta are Mark D. Pagel, Greg W. Rouse, Christer Erséus, Michael F. Whiting, Kristian Fauchald, Fredrik Ronquist, Tor Ørvig, Anders Warén, Donald Lj Quicke and Laure Desutter‐Grandcolas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.