Chinese Physics C

3.5k papers and 28.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.5k papers published in Chinese Physics C in the last decades have received a total of 28.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Physics C usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.6k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (666 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (622 papers) specifically the topics of Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (1.2k papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1.2k papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (770 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Physics C are P. Molaro, S. Sarkar, Brian D. Fields, M. Wang, F. G. Kondev, G. Audi, W. J. Huang, S. Naimi, B. Pfeiffer and M. MacCormick.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chinese Physics C

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Physics C. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Physics C.

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Physics C

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Physics C. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Physics C with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Physics C more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025