Yearbook of Medical Informatics

751 papers and 10.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 751 papers published in Yearbook of Medical Informatics in the last decades have received a total of 10.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Yearbook of Medical Informatics usually cover Health Information Management (328 papers), Molecular Biology (171 papers) and General Health Professions (168 papers) specifically the topics of Electronic Health Records Systems (289 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (142 papers) and Mobile Health Interventions and Applications (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Yearbook of Medical Informatics are Suzanne Austin Boren, E. Andrew Balas, R. Scott Evans, Olivier Bodenreider, George Demiris, Stéphane M. Meystre, Guergana Savova, John F. Hurdle, Betsy L. Humphreys and D. A. B. Lindberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Yearbook of Medical Informatics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Yearbook of Medical Informatics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

Countries where authors publish in Yearbook of Medical Informatics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Yearbook of Medical Informatics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Yearbook of Medical Informatics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yearbook of Medical Informatics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025