Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 1×
×0.516k/34kMM
×0.47k/16kSNP
×0.87k/9kGEOPH
×1.07k/7kOE
×0.63k/5kEP
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Wave Motion
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Wave Motion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Wave Motion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wave Motion more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Wave Motion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Wave Motion.
About Wave Motion
The 2.8k papers published in Wave Motion in the last decades have received a total of 43.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Wave Motion usually cover Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (576 papers), Oceanography (507 papers), Mechanics of Materials (1.0k papers), Earth-Surface Processes (215 papers) and Geophysics (358 papers) specifically the topics of Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (586 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (432 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (412 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (412 papers), Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (317 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (313 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (306 papers) and Seismic Waves and Analysis (268 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Wave Motion are Stuart Crampin, Dan Givoli, Robert Burridge, Andrew N. Norris, Ajit Mal, J.R. Willis, Joseph B. Keller, M. M. Popov, Allen Taflove and F.G. Mitri.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.