This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Virus Genes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Virus Genes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virus Genes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Virus Genes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Virus Genes.
About Virus Genes
The 3.1k papers published in Virus Genes in the last decades have received a total of 52.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Virus Genes usually cover Endocrinology (364 papers), Virology (288 papers), Animal Science and Zoology (597 papers), Infectious Diseases (950 papers) and Agronomy and Crop Science (410 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Virus Research Studies (828 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (596 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (543 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (452 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (409 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (375 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (347 papers) and Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (345 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Virus Genes are Yechiel Becker, Daesub Song, Bong‐Kyun Park, Esteban Domingo, John J. Holland, Said A. Ghabrial, Michael Tristem, Robert J. Gifford, Roger Hull and Paul Schnitzler.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.