Veterinary Record Open

244 papers and 2.1k indexed citations

About

The 244 papers published in Veterinary Record Open in the last decades have received a total of 2.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Veterinary Record Open usually cover Small Animals (85 papers), Genetics (46 papers) and Agronomy and Crop Science (45 papers) specifically the topics of Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (29 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (25 papers) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Veterinary Record Open are Miguel Á. Moreno, Robert Goggs, Heather Bacon, Fiona C. Rioja-Lang, Melanie Connor, Catherine M Dwyer, Carola Fischer‐Tenhagen, W. Heuwieser, Rachael Tarlinton and D.C. Wathes.

In The Last Decade

Veterinary Record Open

237 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Veterinary Record Open

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Veterinary Record Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Veterinary Record Open.

Countries where authors publish in Veterinary Record Open

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Veterinary Record Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Veterinary Record Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veterinary Record Open more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026