Urban History Review

546 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 546 papers published in Urban History Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Urban History Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (334 papers), Urban Studies (69 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (56 papers) specifically the topics of Canadian Identity and History (272 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (60 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Urban History Review are Penelope Edmonds, Jason Gilliland, Robert Lewis, David L. A. Gordon, Raphaël Fischler, Richard Dennis, Peter G. Goheen, J. David Hulchanski, Arn Keeling and John C. Weaver.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Urban History Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Urban History Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Urban History Review.

Countries where authors publish in Urban History Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Urban History Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Urban History Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Urban History Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025