Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi

367 papers and 515 indexed citations i.

About

The 367 papers published in Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi in the last decades have received a total of 515 indexed citations. Papers published in Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi usually cover Political Science and International Relations (256 papers), Sociology and Political Science (158 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (64 papers) specifically the topics of Turkey's Politics and Society (108 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (57 papers) and Historical Turkish Studies (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi are Pınar Bilgin, Mustafa Aydın, Richard Jackson, Bahar Rumelili, Lerna K. Yanık, Ayhan Kaya, Emilian Kavalski, William Hale, Gareth M. Winrow and Özgür Özdamar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi.

Countries where authors publish in Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025