Trauma Violence & Abuse

1.3k papers and 47.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Trauma Violence & Abuse in the last decades have received a total of 47.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Trauma Violence & Abuse usually cover Clinical Psychology (786 papers), Health (667 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (524 papers) specifically the topics of Intimate Partner and Family Violence (639 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (497 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (303 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trauma Violence & Abuse are Naomi Breslau, Michael Ungar, Katie M. Edwards, Emily R. Dworkin, Laura C. Wilson, Ko Ling Chan, Ann L. Coker, Rebecca Campbell, John P. Wilson and Ola W. Barnett.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Trauma Violence & Abuse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trauma Violence & Abuse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trauma Violence & Abuse.

Countries where authors publish in Trauma Violence & Abuse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trauma Violence & Abuse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trauma Violence & Abuse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trauma Violence & Abuse more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025