Labour / Le Travail

2.3k papers and 30.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Labour / Le Travail in the last decades have received a total of 30.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Labour / Le Travail usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.1k papers), Public Administration (266 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (200 papers) specifically the topics of Canadian Identity and History (638 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (262 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Labour / Le Travail are Cedric J. Robinson, Lorraine O'Donnell, Anne McClintock, Cyril Levitt, Todd Gitlin, Charles F. Sabel, Michael J. Piore, Sidney H. Ingerman, Philip McMichael and Adam Przeworski.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Labour / Le Travail

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Labour / Le Travail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Labour / Le Travail.

Countries where authors publish in Labour / Le Travail

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Labour / Le Travail. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Labour / Le Travail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Labour / Le Travail more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025