Transinformação

529 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 529 papers published in Transinformação in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Transinformação usually cover Information Systems (289 papers), Information Systems and Management (159 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (155 papers) specifically the topics of Information Science and Libraries (235 papers), Business and Management Studies (147 papers) and Education and Digital Technologies (111 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Transinformação are Jesús Pascual Mena‐Chalco, Carmen Gálvez, Eduardo A. Haddad, Wolfgang Glänzel, Rogério Mugnaini, Francisco Segado‐Boj, Luís Fernando Sayão, Maria Inês Tomaél, Luciano Antônio Digiampietri and Regina María Marteleto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Transinformação

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Transinformação. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Transinformação.

Countries where authors publish in Transinformação

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Transinformação. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Transinformação with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transinformação more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025