tm - Technisches Messen

1.9k papers and 5.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in tm - Technisches Messen in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations. Papers published in tm - Technisches Messen usually cover Mechanical Engineering (628 papers), Biomedical Engineering (500 papers) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (489 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (339 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (163 papers) and Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (152 papers). The most active scholars publishing in tm - Technisches Messen are Fernando Puente León, Andreas Schütze, H. Bettin, F. Spieweck, Michael Heizmann, Olfa Kanoun, Eberhard Manske, Robert Schmitt, Tino Hausotte and Klaus‐Dieter Sommer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in tm - Technisches Messen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in tm - Technisches Messen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in tm - Technisches Messen.

Countries where authors publish in tm - Technisches Messen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in tm - Technisches Messen. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in tm - Technisches Messen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites tm - Technisches Messen more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025