Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

728 papers and 8.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 728 papers published in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics in the last decades have received a total of 8.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics usually cover General Health Professions (319 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (209 papers) and Philosophy (158 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in medical practice (241 papers), Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Medical Decision-Making (121 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (117 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics are Douglas S. Diekema, Daniel P. Sulmasy, Havi Carel, Fredrik Svenaeus, Dan W. Brock, Kenneth Kipnis, Dominic Wilkinson, Erica K. Salter, Stephen G. Henry and Edmund D. Pellegrino.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics.

Countries where authors publish in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025