Teoría y Realidad Constitucional

566 papers and 487 indexed citations i.

About

The 566 papers published in Teoría y Realidad Constitucional in the last decades have received a total of 487 indexed citations. Papers published in Teoría y Realidad Constitucional usually cover Political Science and International Relations (476 papers), Sociology and Political Science (402 papers) and Law (193 papers) specifically the topics of Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (385 papers), Human Rights and Immigration (385 papers) and Legal processes and jurisprudence (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Teoría y Realidad Constitucional are Francisco Javier García Roca, Antonio Enrique Pérez Luño, Abraham Barrero Ortega, Carlos Fernández‐Delgado, Víctor Ferreres Comella, Juan José Ruíz Ruíz, Pedro Cruz Villalón, Peter Häberle, Ana M. Contreras and Alejandro Nieto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Teoría y Realidad Constitucional

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Teoría y Realidad Constitucional. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Teoría y Realidad Constitucional.

Countries where authors publish in Teoría y Realidad Constitucional

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Teoría y Realidad Constitucional. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Teoría y Realidad Constitucional with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teoría y Realidad Constitucional more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025