Replace Journal of Dermatological Case Reports with:
Journal of Dermatological Case ReportsUnited States
Current Problems in DermatologyUnited States
Dermatology ReportsItaly
JAAD InternationalUnited States
Italian Journal of Dermatology and VenereologyItaly
Recent Patents on Inflammation & Allergy Drug DiscoveryIndia
BMC DermatologyUnited States
Dermatology Research and PracticeUnited States
Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina Pannonica et AdriaticaSlovenia
Drugs in ContextUnited States
Journal of Dermatological Case ReportsUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to SKINmed Dermatology for the Clinician
SKINmed Dermatology for the Clinician · 1×
×0.71.1kDERMA
×1.0792EPIDE
×1.3639PFM
×0.5215CB
×0.9380RHEUM
Citations per year, relative to SKINmed Dermatology for the Clinician
SKINmed Dermatology for the Clinician · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Countries where authors publish in SKINmed Dermatology for the Clinician
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in SKINmed Dermatology for the Clinician. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in SKINmed Dermatology for the Clinician with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites SKINmed Dermatology for the Clinician more than expected).
Fields of papers published in SKINmed Dermatology for the Clinician
This network shows the impact of papers published in SKINmed Dermatology for the Clinician. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in SKINmed Dermatology for the Clinician.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.