Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology

768 papers and 15.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 768 papers published in Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 15.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology usually cover Surgery (224 papers), Oncology (194 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (191 papers) specifically the topics of Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (70 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (64 papers) and Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology are Markku Miettinen, Jerzy Lasota, Mark R. Wick, Robert H. Young, Pedram Argani, Volkan Adsay, Jeannette Guarner, Matthew S. Johnson, Justin Hartke and Marwan Ghabril.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025