Countries where authors publish in Scripta geologica
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Scripta geologica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Scripta geologica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scripta geologica more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Scripta geologica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Scripta geologica.
About Scripta geologica
The 246 papers published in Scripta geologica in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Scripta geologica usually cover Paleontology (144 papers), Geology (32 papers), Oceanography (52 papers), Ecology (89 papers) and Atmospheric Science (54 papers) specifically the topics of Evolution and Paleontology Studies (89 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (74 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (54 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (41 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (36 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (29 papers), Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (24 papers) and Geological and Geophysical Studies (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Scripta geologica are M. Freudenthal, John W.M. Jagt, J.W.F. Reumer, Frank P. Wesselingh, M. van den Boogaard, Ph. J. Hoedemaeker, Lars W. van den Hoek Ostende, Tamara I. Nemyrovska, P. Mein and Elvira Martín Suárez.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.