Countries where authors publish in Scientia Marina
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Scientia Marina. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Scientia Marina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scientia Marina more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Scientia Marina. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Scientia Marina.
About Scientia Marina
The 2.4k papers published in Scientia Marina in the last decades have received a total of 51.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Scientia Marina usually cover Oceanography (926 papers), Aquatic Science (397 papers), Global and Planetary Change (1.1k papers), Ecology (961 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (334 papers) specifically the topics of Marine and fisheries research (768 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (573 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (366 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (293 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (281 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (273 papers), Marine Ecology and Invasive Species (234 papers) and Crustacean biology and ecology (212 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Scientia Marina are Andrew Bakun, Marta Estrada, Josep M. Gasol, Paul A. del Giorgio, Enric Ballesteros, Francesc Maynou, Jordi Lleonart, Thomas Kiørboe, Carlos A. Assis and Josep María Gili.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.