Russian Studies in Philosophy

259 papers and 202 indexed citations i.

About

The 259 papers published in Russian Studies in Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 202 indexed citations. Papers published in Russian Studies in Philosophy usually cover Sociology and Political Science (70 papers), Philosophy (57 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (23 papers) specifically the topics of Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia (25 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (20 papers) and Religious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Russian Studies in Philosophy are Vladislav A. Lektorsky, Nina Dmitrieva, Ėvalʹd Vasilʹevich Ilʹenkov, Andrey Smirnov, В. В. Давыдов, Georg Henrik von Wright, В. В. Соколов, David Bakhurst, Aleksandr V. Sokolov and Nikolaĭ Berdi︠a︡ev.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Russian Studies in Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Russian Studies in Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Russian Studies in Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Russian Studies in Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Russian Studies in Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Russian Studies in Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Russian Studies in Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025