Review of Cognitive Linguistics

271 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 271 papers published in Review of Cognitive Linguistics in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Cognitive Linguistics usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (219 papers), Language and Linguistics (169 papers) and Social Psychology (35 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (213 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (62 papers) and linguistics and terminology studies (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Cognitive Linguistics are Gerard J. Steen, Zoltán Kövecses, Cliff Goddard, William Labov, Barbara Shaffer, Aseel Zibin, Frank Boers, Alan Cienki, Michael Kimmel and Tyler Peterson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Cognitive Linguistics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Cognitive Linguistics.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Cognitive Linguistics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Cognitive Linguistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Cognitive Linguistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Cognitive Linguistics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025