Reproductive Biology

888 papers and 10.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 888 papers published in Reproductive Biology in the last decades have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Reproductive Biology usually cover Reproductive Medicine (397 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (354 papers) and Molecular Biology (214 papers) specifically the topics of Reproductive Biology and Fertility (326 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (211 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (171 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reproductive Biology are Anita Franczak, Mariusz P. Kowalewski, J. Kotwica, Viktoriya Dzyuba, Yan Cheng, Thierry Lodé, Phillip Matson, Jacky Cosson, Robert Rękawiecki and Jenny A. Visser.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reproductive Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reproductive Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reproductive Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Reproductive Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reproductive Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reproductive Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reproductive Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025