Quality in primary care

304 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 304 papers published in Quality in primary care in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Quality in primary care usually cover General Health Professions (163 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (70 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (42 papers) specifically the topics of Primary Care and Health Outcomes (73 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (34 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quality in primary care are Elisabeth Assing Hvidt, Ruth Chambers, David Cunningham, Rachel Sokal, A Niroshan Siriwardena, Paul Ward, Charlotte Williamson, Moyez Jiwa, Clare Gerada and John Chatwin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quality in primary care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quality in primary care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quality in primary care.

Countries where authors publish in Quality in primary care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quality in primary care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quality in primary care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality in primary care more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025