Countries where authors publish in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
This network shows the impact of papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open.
About Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
The 6.5k papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open in the last decades have received a total of 40.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open usually cover Surgery (4.5k papers), Dermatology (886 papers) and Rehabilitation (476 papers) specifically the topics of Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (2.0k papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (1.1k papers) and Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (953 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open are Eric Swanson, Jeffrey E. Janis, Rod J. Rohrich, Rei Ogawa, Maurice Y. Nahabedian, Donald H. Lalonde, Kyle R. Eberlin, Sumeet S. Teotia, Anna Schoenbrunner and Jordan D. Frey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.