Project Appraisal

256 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 256 papers published in Project Appraisal in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Project Appraisal usually cover Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (77 papers), Economics and Econometrics (54 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (33 papers) specifically the topics of Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (60 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (20 papers) and Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Project Appraisal are Norman Lee, Fiona Walsh, John Cairns, Erhun Kula, William R. Sheate, David P. Lawrence, Colin Price, Michael M. Cernea, Anil Markandya and David Pearce.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Project Appraisal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Project Appraisal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Project Appraisal.

Countries where authors publish in Project Appraisal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Project Appraisal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Project Appraisal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Project Appraisal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025