Progress in Orthodontics

About

The 681 papers published in Progress in Orthodontics in the last decades have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Orthodontics usually cover Orthodontics (525 papers), Oral Surgery (290 papers) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (215 papers) specifically the topics of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (498 papers), Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (215 papers) and dental development and anomalies (190 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Orthodontics are Ali Borzabadi‐Farahani, Carlos Flores‐Mir, Luca Lombardo, Gíuseppe Siciliani, Kyung-Min Lee, Vahid Rakhshan, Alberto Caprioglio, Theodore Eliades, Nikolaos Pandis and Won Moon.

In The Last Decade

Progress in Orthodontics

650 papers receiving 12.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Progress in Orthodontics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Orthodontics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Orthodontics.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Orthodontics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Orthodontics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Orthodontics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Orthodontics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026