Professional Case Management

555 papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 555 papers published in Professional Case Management in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Professional Case Management usually cover General Health Professions (289 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (103 papers) and Epidemiology (72 papers) specifically the topics of Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (93 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (91 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Professional Case Management are Diane E. Holland, Amy C. Smith, Suzanne K. Powell, Barbara Bennett Jacobs, Diane L. Huber, Kathryn H. Bowles, Brian W. Jack, Jeffrey L. Greenwald, Robert Newcomer and Carol Hall.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Professional Case Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Professional Case Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Professional Case Management.

Countries where authors publish in Professional Case Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Professional Case Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Professional Case Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Professional Case Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025