Process Safety Progress

1.6k papers and 13.5k indexed citations

About

The 1.6k papers published in Process Safety Progress in the last decades have received a total of 13.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Process Safety Progress usually cover Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (1.2k papers), Aerospace Engineering (551 papers) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (503 papers) specifically the topics of Risk and Safety Analysis (1.2k papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (537 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (503 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Process Safety Progress are Faisal Khan, Paul Baybutt, S. A. Abbasi, Laurence G. Britton, Dennis C. Hendershot, Paul Amyotte, Daniel A. Crowl, G. A. Melhem, Joseph F. Louvar and Chad V. Mashuga.

In The Last Decade

Process Safety Progress

1.4k papers receiving 11.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Process Safety Progress

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Process Safety Progress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Process Safety Progress.

Countries where authors publish in Process Safety Progress

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Process Safety Progress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Process Safety Progress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Process Safety Progress more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026