Pregnancy Hypertension

1.7k papers and 14.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Pregnancy Hypertension in the last decades have received a total of 14.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Pregnancy Hypertension usually cover Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.5k papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (916 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (278 papers) specifically the topics of Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (1.5k papers), Birth, Development, and Health (641 papers) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (326 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pregnancy Hypertension are James M. Roberts, Mark Brown, Laura A. Magee, S. Ananth Karumanchi, Andrea Luigi Tranquilli, Carlos Escudero, Fergus P. McCarthy, Peter von Dadelszen, Gustaaf Dekker and C.W.G. Redman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pregnancy Hypertension

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pregnancy Hypertension. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pregnancy Hypertension.

Countries where authors publish in Pregnancy Hypertension

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pregnancy Hypertension. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pregnancy Hypertension with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pregnancy Hypertension more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025