Countries where authors publish in Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering
This network shows the impact of papers published in Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering.
About Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering
The 3.6k papers published in Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 54.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering usually cover Polymers and Plastics (2.3k papers), Biomaterials (878 papers) and Molecular Medicine (125 papers) specifically the topics of Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (1.0k papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (663 papers) and biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (611 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering are Ayesha Kausar, Tapan K. Das, Bakhtiar Muhammad, Pragyan Mohan, Sanjay K. Nayak, Smita Mohanty, H. Ismail, Alireza Ashori, Irum Rafique and Satyendra Mishra.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.