Perspectives in Vascular Surgery

454 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 454 papers published in Perspectives in Vascular Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Perspectives in Vascular Surgery usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (265 papers), Surgery (239 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (116 papers) specifically the topics of Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (111 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (85 papers) and Vascular Procedures and Complications (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Perspectives in Vascular Surgery are Péter Gloviczki, John V. White, A. J. Comerota, Gustavo S. Oderich, Britt H. Tonnessen, Gustavo S. Oderich, Matthew T. Menard, Robert B. McLafferty, Chris Compton and Richard P. Cambria.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Perspectives in Vascular Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Perspectives in Vascular Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Perspectives in Vascular Surgery.

Countries where authors publish in Perspectives in Vascular Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Perspectives in Vascular Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Perspectives in Vascular Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Perspectives in Vascular Surgery more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025