Countries where authors publish in European Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Journal of Pediatric Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Journal of Pediatric Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Journal of Pediatric Surgery more than expected).
Fields of papers published in European Journal of Pediatric Surgery
This network shows the impact of papers published in European Journal of Pediatric Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Journal of Pediatric Surgery.
About European Journal of Pediatric Surgery
The 4.0k papers published in European Journal of Pediatric Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 41.0k indexed citations . Papers published in European Journal of Pediatric Surgery usually cover Urology (422 papers), Surgery (2.9k papers) and Gastroenterology (213 papers) specifically the topics of Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders (525 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (456 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (432 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Journal of Pediatric Surgery are Benno Ure, Agostino Pierro, A. M. Holschneider, Simon Eaton, Maria Michejda, W. Meier‐Ruge, Juan A. Tovar, Risto Rintala, Augusto Zani and Carmen Dingemann.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.