Countries where authors publish in Papillomavirus Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Papillomavirus Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Papillomavirus Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Papillomavirus Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Papillomavirus Research
This network shows the impact of papers published in Papillomavirus Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Papillomavirus Research.
About Papillomavirus Research
The 191 papers published in Papillomavirus Research in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Papillomavirus Research usually cover Epidemiology (174 papers), Otorhinolaryngology (17 papers) and Health (28 papers) specifically the topics of Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (171 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (72 papers), Genital Health and Disease (53 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (27 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (21 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (17 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (16 papers) and Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Papillomavirus Research are Karen Canfell, Massimo Tommasino, Sadao Suzuki, Akihiro Hosono, Zeev Rosberger, Julia Brotherton, Charles Lacey, John Doorbar, Gilla K. Shapiro and Samara Perez.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.