Otolaryngology

16.3k papers and 311.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 16.3k papers published in Otolaryngology in the last decades have received a total of 311.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Otolaryngology usually cover Surgery (6.6k papers), Otorhinolaryngology (4.3k papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (3.7k papers) specifically the topics of Tracheal and airway disorders (2.3k papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (2.0k papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (1.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Otolaryngology are Derald E. Brackmann, Richard M. Rosenfeld, John W. House, John M. Epley, Neil Bhattacharyya, Michael S. Benninger, David W. Kennedy, Heinz Stammberger, Scott E. Brietzke and Donald C. Lanza.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Otolaryngology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Otolaryngology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Otolaryngology.

Countries where authors publish in Otolaryngology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Otolaryngology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Otolaryngology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otolaryngology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025