This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ocean science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ocean science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ocean science more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Ocean science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ocean science.
About Ocean science
The 1.5k papers published in Ocean science in the last decades have received a total of 35.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Ocean science usually cover Oceanography (1.3k papers), Atmospheric Science (639 papers), Global and Planetary Change (636 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (117 papers) and Environmental Chemistry (88 papers) specifically the topics of Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (1.1k papers), Climate variability and models (496 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (469 papers), Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (304 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (221 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (190 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (146 papers) and Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (127 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ocean science are Pierre‐Yves Le Traon, Céline Heuzé, Michäel Ablain, Laurent Bertino, Jochen Kämpf, Nicolas Picot, Rainer Feistel, Martin Johnson, Yannice Faugère and S. Guinehut.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.